I’m not anti bio-fuel, just pro PHEV… here’s why

Posted January 28th, 2008 by Michael Janzen and filed in Editorial
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Add a Comment

If you start reading my posts you might think I’m anti bio-diesel and ethanol. Actually I’m pretty much pro everything green. I simply think that plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) are the best short term solution. PHEVs and bio -uels are also not mutually exclusive. Why couldn’t a flex fuel, bio-diesel, or even strait vegetable oil (SVO) engine be mounted in a PHEV?

The problem I see with bio-fuels is simply infrastructure, and a lack of it. I live near Sacramento, California’s state capital and right smack dab in the middle of one of the biggest agricultural centers in the world. You’d think there would be tons of gas stations offering bio-diesel, ethanol and E85. I’m sad to say that’s not the case. I know bizarre but a good example of the problem.

All around me are people who would adopt bio-fuel cars but there are few options for supporting such a vehicle in sight. I’m forced to conclude that if we want an immediate solution we have to accept the enormous wide spread availability of fossil fuels… but only for the short term while the bio-fuel infrastructure is built.

PHEVs represent a bridge to all electric cars which is where I think we need to go. Burning anything at the vehicle isn’t the most ideal long term goal. Burning hydrogen at the car is a second best but even that has draw backs. The vast majority of hydrogen production today comes from processing fossil fuel. If we move toward hydrogen fuel cells with the goal of satying off fossil fuels we must put in a hydrogen manufacturing infrastructure that uses electrolysis of water.

Electricity is also a major issue. About half of the electricity in the United States comes from burning coal, thanks to George W Bush and his coal lobby buddies. Before bush natural gas was the major fossil fuel used for generating electricity. So if Americans really want to kick the fossil fuel habit long term we need to get off this coal burned for electricity practice too.

So if it were up to me… ha ha… all auto makers would slow hydrogen fuel cell research for now, since it is so long term, and focus on building flex-fuel plug-in hybrids. Advancing battery technology would need to become the primary focus of research. Building a decentralized power grid that gets the vast majority of it’s power from renewable sources like wind and solar. For example if all our homes has a couple dozen photovoltaic panels on the roof all feeding power back to the grid, and our cars stored electricity at night, as PHEVs do, we’d be in far better shape. We’d also have a path laid out to a future filled with fun, fast and silent electric cars.

Bio-fuels in my mind will help us get there, and may play a role in generating electricity in the future, but PHEVs in the short term followed by a long term goal off all electric cars makes a whole lot more sense. Comments?

Make A Statement – Drive A smart fortwo

Posted January 5th, 2008 by Michael Janzen and filed in Smart
Tags: , , ,
1 Comment

smart fortwoActually if you stop to think just for a second how cool (in an eco-geek kind of way) it would be to own one of these things, you might just decide to reserve one right now. They’re making it easy too, $99 will reserve your place in line right now and you could be showing it off in your driveway sooner than you might think.

Yes, smart is coming to America in Q1 2008! The base price of one of these little numbers will be just under $12,000. It’s powered by a 3-cylinder, 1-liter, 70 hp, gasoline powered engine that gets 40/45 (EPA 2007) or 33/41 (EPA 2008). It comes with a 5 speed automated manual transmission, anti-lock breaks, an electronic stability program, air bags, central locking with remote, and manual windows and mirrors. Air conditioning, power steering, sunroof, alarm, heated seats, and radio, are on the options list. Performance is a bit wimpy as expected at 12.8 seconds for a 0 to 60 run and the top speed is electronically limited to 90 MPH.

For the uninitiated, smart (yes all lowercase) is a member of the Mercedes Car Group. Today there are 750,000 fortwos running around 36 different countries around the world. When the United States starts selling the smart fortwo it will be the 37th country to get smart… pun intended.

Unfortunately the car doesn’t come in green. We can’t imagine buying one of these unless it was green. If you’re going to make a statement like this wouldn’t you want to go all the way? Comments?